I’ve been thinking a lot about money and presents lately. Not in that awkward “how much did you spend on me” way we all pretend doesn’t matter (but absolutely does). It’s more about how the price of a gift creates this weird invisible forcefield around the entire exchange that nobody talks about openly.
Last month, Charlie and I were at his sister Beth’s birthday dinner. She’d unwrapped this gorgeous hand-painted ceramic bowl from her friend Maisie – proper artisanal stuff that probably cost about £30. Beth was literally stroking it, going on about how perfect it would look with her new dining table. Then she opened our gift – a fancy bottle of champagne and a spa voucher worth five times as much – and gave us a polite “oh lovely, thanks” before putting it aside. Charlie didn’t notice, but I was properly gutted. The champagne would be gone in an evening, the voucher possibly forgotten in her handbag, while Maisie’s bowl would be displayed and admired for years.
It got me thinking about all the times I’ve been on both sides of this equation. I’m someone who spent years studying the psychology of gifting (yes, really – I was that sad student with spreadsheets tracking gift successes), and even I still get it wrong sometimes. Price points in gift-giving are like this invisible emotional minefield we’re all tiptoeing through.
Let’s start with the super cheap but meaningful gift, shall we? My mate Priya is the absolute queen of the under-a-tenner present that somehow makes you feel like she’s reached inside your brain and plucked out your deepest desires. Last Christmas, she gave me a £7 secondhand book – a rare edition of a childhood favourite I’d mentioned ONCE during a wine-fuelled chat six months earlier. I actually cried. Meanwhile, my wealthy aunt regularly sends £100 John Lewis vouchers that I’m always grateful for but that never prompt more than a dutiful thank-you text.
The thing is, when we receive gifts, we’re not really judging them on monetary value (unless you’re my ex-boyfriend Marcus, who literally Google-searched everything I gave him, the absolute wanker). We’re assessing how well the giver knows us. That’s why a cheap gift that perfectly aligns with your interests feels more valuable than an expensive but generic one.
I learned this lesson the hard way during my first year working at British Celebrations. My salary had tripled from my previous job, and I went absolutely mental at Christmas, splashing out on everyone. My mum got this ridiculously expensive cashmere cardigan in a beautiful emerald green. She smiled politely when she opened it, but I could tell something was off. Later, I found it still in its box when I visited three months later. “It’s too nice to wear around the house,” she explained, which is mum-code for “this doesn’t fit into my actual life at all.” The next year, I bought her four inexpensive but incredibly soft M&S jumpers in the practical colours she actually wears, and she texts me photos of herself wearing them at least once a fortnight.
There’s something uncomfortable about receiving a gift that’s clearly much more expensive than what you’d typically buy for that person. I once had a new friend give me a £200 pair of designer sunglasses for my birthday when we’d only known each other for about three months. Instead of being thrilled, I felt weirdly anxious – like I now owed her something or had misunderstood the nature of our friendship. Was this normal for her? Was I supposed to reciprocate at this level? The sunglasses sat in their case for ages because wearing them made me feel self-conscious, like I was carrying around evidence of a friendship imbalance on my face.
On the flip side, I’ve definitely been the over-gifter too. When Charlie and I first started dating, I gave him this elaborate homemade birthday gift – a custom-built miniature version of his childhood treehouse based on photos his mum had shown me, complete with tiny working lights and furniture. It took me weeks to make. His face when he opened it was a complicated mixture of awe and mild terror. “This is… incredible. I got you concert tickets,” he said, looking slightly panicked. Poor bloke thought I was going to be disappointed, when actually his gift was perfect – something we could experience together rather than an object that silently screamed “I’VE FALLEN TOO HARD TOO FAST.”
The mid-range gift (that £20-50 sweet spot) often seems to be the safest territory. It’s substantial enough to show thought without triggering the awkwardness that can come with extreme price points. My friend group has naturally settled around this range for birthdays, and honestly, it removes so much stress. But even this “safe zone” isn’t foolproof.
I once spent £40 on a supposedly perfect gift for my colleague Sara – a specially sourced Japanese green tea set because she’d mentioned loving her time in Tokyo. When she opened it, there was this microsecond flash of confusion before she recovered and thanked me profusely. Turns out she’d developed an intolerance to green tea since her Japan days and couldn’t actually drink the stuff anymore. Meanwhile, at the same office exchange, someone gave her a £12 desk plant that she absolutely adored and still has three years later.
The price-to-meaning ratio seems to follow its own bizarre logic. I’ve noticed that gifts under £15 are often judged purely on thoughtfulness – nobody expects a tenner to change their life, so when a cheap gift shows real observation, it’s delightful. Gifts between £15-50 seem to face the toughest scrutiny – they need to be both thoughtful AND useful or beautiful to truly land. And once you go over £50, there’s this weird pressure for the gift to somehow justify its price tag through either extreme practicality or luxury.
I’ve conducted some decidedly unscientific research on this (meaning I’ve interrogated literally everyone I know about their gift experiences after a few drinks). The most treasured gifts people mentioned rarely correlated with price. My brother’s favourite gift ever was a £15 personalised keyring from his girlfriend with coordinates of where they first met. My best friend Sophie still talks about the mix CD I made her when we were 16 – literally cost me nothing but time. Meanwhile, her ex once bought her a £600 designer handbag that she quietly sold on eBay six months later.
There’s also the absolute nightmare territory of group gifts, where price points become explicitly discussed. You know how it goes – someone suggests chipping in for a colleague’s leaving present, then Stephanie from HR sends round that passive-aggressive email: “Thinking £25 each would be appropriate.” And suddenly you’re mentally calculating if Jenny who’s been here three months should pay the same as Muhammad who’s worked alongside them for five years, and whether you’ll be judged if you suggest a tenner instead.
I once organised a wedding gift for my childhood friend Leila. We had friends with wildly different financial situations, from struggling students to established professionals. I suggested a tiered system – contribute what you can between £10-50, and everyone would sign the same card regardless. One friend privately messaged me asking if her £10 contribution would be listed somewhere, worried about looking cheap. Another insisted on sending £100 and making sure Leila knew exactly what portion of the gift was from her. The whole thing became this strange exercise in gift economics rather than a celebration of our friend’s marriage.
Christmas is where the price point anxiety reaches its peak, isn’t it? The unspoken calculations: how much did they spend on me last year? Are we at the same gifting level? The silent crushing disappointment when you’ve spent £40 on someone who got you a £5 charity shop book (that they possibly regifted – Sarah, I saw that faded gift tag inside, you monster).
My family tried setting a £30 limit one year to ease this tension. It was a complete disaster. My sister Olivia is the queen of finding incredible bargains, so her “£30” gifts looked suspiciously generous. Meanwhile, my brother Tom interpreted the limit as “approximately £30” and spent closer to £50 on everyone. I stuck rigidly to £29.99 per person and ended up feeling oddly resentful, like I was the only one following the rules of a game nobody else was actually playing.
The most awkward price point situations definitely come with new relationships – romantic or friendship. There’s that terrifying period where you haven’t established your gift baseline yet. The first birthday, the first Christmas – these are treacherous waters. Go too expensive and you might seem overwhelming; too cheap and you risk seeming uninterested.
When Charlie and I had our first Christmas together, I had a proper meltdown in Boots three days before, clutching a basket containing both a reasonable £35 grooming set AND a significantly more expensive watch I couldn’t really afford. I ended up buying both and keeping the receipts for both, planning to make a game-time decision based on whatever he gave me. Utterly ridiculous behaviour. (For the record, we matched almost exactly without prior discussion, both spending about £60 on small collections of thoughtful items. I returned the watch and learned an important lesson about not being a completely neurotic gift-giver.)
I think what I’ve ultimately learned from being on both sides of the price point equation is that the best approach is radically straightforward: buy what you think the person will genuinely appreciate, at a price that feels comfortable to you without causing financial strain. That’s it. No complex calculations, no desperate matching attempts.
If you can find something inexpensive that perfectly aligns with someone’s interests, that’s infinitely better than an expensive gift chosen with less insight. And if you’re on the receiving end of a gift that seems mismatched to your relationship – either too expensive or too cheap – try to focus on the intention rather than the price tag.
I keep a list on my phone of things people mention wanting or needing throughout the year. It’s saved me countless hours of pre-birthday panic buying and resulted in far more successful gifts. Price becomes secondary when you nail the actual thing they want.
The best gift I ever received was from Charlie three years ago – a battered second-hand copy of a childhood book I thought had gone out of print, which he’d spent months tracking down through specialist booksellers. Cost him about £8 plus postage. Meanwhile, the fancy juicer my parents got me the same Christmas (easily ten times the price) was used precisely twice before becoming an overqualified paperweight in our kitchen cupboard.
Maybe that’s the real gift equation: thoughtfulness multiplied by usefulness, divided by obligation, with price as just one small factor in a much more complicated emotional math. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go wrap my godson’s birthday present – a £12.99 dinosaur torch that makes realistic roaring sounds. His mum will probably hate me for the noise, but he’s going to lose his little mind over it. And really, isn’t that what gifting should be about?
Leave a Reply